Further Readings
Comparison
Why Upsonic?
Features | Upsonic | CrewAI | LangGraph |
---|---|---|---|
Github Star | 6.7K | 27.1K | 9.4K |
Pricing | Open Source / Enterprise Edition | Open Source / Enterprise Edition | Open Source / Enterprise Edition |
Architecture | Task-based agent architecture | Role-Based agent architecture | Graph-based multi-agent architecture |
Reliability Score | 98.2% | 87.5% | 6.3% |
Learning Curve | Easy | Easy | A little bit difficult (Graph structure) |
Tools (MCP) | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
*Development Experience | Tasks and Agents can be implemented with just two lines of code rapid development and iteration processes. | Multiple file structures, YAML configurations, and various setup files are required for implementation. | A graph-based design implementation is required, which presents challenges in terms of clarity.” |
Using as Client | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Multi-Agent Processing | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Process Control (Human-in-the-loop) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Dependency | Few dependency | Heavy Installation / Many dependency | Few dependency |
Light Weight | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Memory Capability | Low | High | High |
Knowledge Base Capability | Low | High | High |
Direct LLM Call | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Object Response | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Reflection | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Flow | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
Planning | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |